New Thing #269: Sharing History With My Daughters

LibertysKidsI think I've told you before that I just love American history. My daughters have picked up on some of that here and there - like showing an interest in some of the presidents and related trivia - but for the most part they're still a little too young.

For example, my favorite part of American history - the American Revolution - is still a little too far above their heads...and maybe too violent.

But I can't wait for them to be old enough to be really interested, because we live in a place that is so connected to all of that history and we can have some fun little day trips together.

On Saturday, I got a taste of what that might be like.

There's this show called Liberty's Kids which has been around for a decade at least (that's how long I've known about it, anyway) but I've never watched consistently.

I don't even know if they still make new episodes, or if they just show the same ones over and over.

Apparently, as I discovered on Saturday, it's on the local CBS station on Saturdays at noon. (And again at 12:30pm.)

Because it was a particularly busy week, and I couldn't sleep in on Saturday on account of the ballet class, I penciled in a nap around noon on Saturday, once my youngest daughter was down for her nap.

There was no good college football on TV to which I could fall asleep, and I happened to switch by Liberty's Kids. The older two girls seemed interested, and wanted me to leave it on. So I did.

Shot_HeardThey may have been the most exciting episodes ever - featuring April 18, 1775, with the titular kids helping Paul Revere and Billy Dawes alert the countryside that "The Regulars are coming out!", and April 19, 1775 with the Battles of Lexington and Concord. Those may be my two favorite days in American history. (Followed closely by October 25 and 27, 1986, of course, when the Mets won Games 6 and 7 of the World Series.)

Anyway, I drifted in and out of sleep, but it didn't seem like the war scenes were terribly inappropriate for a 5-and-7-year old. There was a death shown, but it wasn't graphic or anything.

I definitely sensed engagement from my daughters...and they certainly made connections knowing they had been to both Concord and Lexington.

It makes me excited for the possibilities of a New Thing in 2015 or 2016 or so - when we can walk the Freedom Trail in Boston as a family.

New Thing #185: Boston 1775 Blog

Boston_1775The 4th of July seems like a good time to tell you (remind you, in some cases) that if I could travel through time to any point in history, it would be Boston, circa 1775. Sure, there would be less of the creature comforts I've grown so used to.

I'd have to adjust to the food.

And boy, would it be smelly.

But I just think, knowing what I know about that time period, it would just be so exciting.

Time machines, as you may or may not know, do not exist.

But I might have come across something just as good.

The Boston 1775 blog was cited often in Nathaniel Philbrick's Bunker Hill. It appeared so often in the Notes section of the book that I couldn't ignore it - and then every time it was mentioned it was about the most interesting topics.

So I made a mental note to check it out when I finished the book.

There is a ton of information on this blog. It's written by J.L. Bell, a Massachusetts writer who, says his bio on the site, specializes in the start of the American Revolution in and around Boston. (My kind of guy!)

The blog was started in May, 2006, and Bell has posted almost every day since then.

I wouldn't exactly say I'm overwhelmed by the content on the blog...it's more that I'm pacing myself. I've only read a few of the entries at this point, but I plan on making my way through the entire thing. (I'm starting in May 2006 and working my way forward, but there doesn't seem to be a need for chronological reading. Probably like my blog - you can essentially pick it up anywhere and go in either direction. But I like chronology.)

I kind of feel the way I do when I have a bunch of shows I want to watch on the DVR (or podcasts in my queue) - at any moment of down time I can just pop onto the Boston 1775 blog and read a few entries. And I'll probably feel a big sense of accomplishment and a small bit of sadness after I make my way through...although the good news here is that there will be a new post almost every day...so long as Bell doesn't decide to quit blogging now that I've decided to start reading.

The entries seem to include everything from short bios and informative texts to primary sources or links to related articles to events taking place today related to the study of the American Revolution. There's also an extensive list of tags on the right hand side of the page so you can click a topic of interest - almost anything or anyone imaginable connected with the Revolution.

If you're interested you can find the blog at Boston1775.blogspot.com.

New Thing #179: Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution

Bunker_Hill_BookI'm kind of obsessed with the American Revolution. Not even the whole war - more like I'm obsessed with colonial Boston, 1770-1775 or so.

I keep reading books that focus on that time period, and I've tried to wean myself away from them so I can learn about other times in history...or even the rest of the war once the regulars left Massachusetts.

The latest addition to my library is Nathaniel Philbrick's Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution.

And I didn't even choose to read this one on my own.

I got a text from my wife one day in May. She was leaving work to enjoy a little bit of a nice day and decided to pop into the bookstore. Did I want anything? she wanted to know. I missed the text, and saw it hours later. (I worked straight through the nice day, I guess.)

When she came home, she had bought Bunker Hill for me - it was just out recently and was getting some good press. I had read about it, and how Philbrick is a good storyteller.

I said above that I didn't choose to read this book on my own...I should actually say that I didn't seek it out on my own. Once it was in my possession I jumped it up on my summer reading to-do list, and I plowed through it pretty quickly.

It's a good book about Boston in the 1760s into March of 1776, and Philbrick is indeed a good storyteller.

I expected, based on the title I guess, the book to focus more on Bunker Hill than it actually did. It was pretty typical Revolutionary Boston fare - talk of taxes, soldiers in Boston, Tea Party, Lexington and Concord, etc. - but it was one of the more detailed accounts of all of these events that I have ever read. And there were hardly any points where my eyes glazed over or something felt boring - it was very engaging throughout.

Another pleasant surprise was how prevalent Joseph Warren was in the book. I've enjoyed learning about Dr. Warren over the years - I definitely didn't learn about him in school and I've come to learn more the more I read - but this book serves as almost a mini-biography of the Boston doctor-turned political and military leader. He's really painted as a Samuel Adams-like ringleader in making things happen that led the colonies into a war with their mother country.

Philbrick offers unique takes on the Boston Tea Party and some of the actions of the Sons of Liberty in Boston, and he spends a couple of chapters going through the events of April 18th and 19th, 1775. I love reading about the messengers (led by Paul Revere) being sent out on the night of the 18th and then the engagements in Lexington and Concord on the 19th, and Philbrick devotes a couple of chapters to these events (and the ensuing chase back to Boston that began the Siege of Boston). As a matter of fact, he spends more time writing about all of that than the title battle.

And he provides some of the goriest details of all of those battles that I've ever read...which paints the writing as realistic, because those were some gory days. (I had never before read about 78-year-old Samuel Whittemore, who killed several regulars on April 19th, then "took a musket ball to the jaw and was bayoneted repeatedly before being left for dead." He then lived for another eleven years.)

I've written before, I think, about my love for Johnny Tremain - a young adult historical fiction novel by Esther Forbes. Much of the book is historically accurate...and some of the incidents in the book that I thought might be somewhat fictional were supported by fact in this book, such as the saying that the regulars marched out on the morning of April 19th whistling 'Yankee Doodle', but would hear it sung back to them before the end of the day, or something along those lines. According to Philbrick, that actually happened...give or take a few details.

One detail I was surprised not to read about in this book was that after Joseph Warren was killed in the Battle of Bunker Hill (spoiler alert!), I had read that his body was so badly disfigured that it could only be identified by his teeth. I had heard this was done by Paul Revere (who made Warren's false teeth), but Philbrick writes it was done by Warren's brother.

I half-read/half-skimmed the notes at the back of the book - they're thorough, citing where Philbrick got all of his information. (And the way I read non-fiction books, I was glad he went with pages of notes at the end rather than footnotes - I always feel obligated to look up footnotes when I come across them. It's hard for me to read books that way.) They're also, by the way, indicative of Philbrick's writing ability - they're very readable. Anyway, I was hoping to see some mention of the Revere/teeth story in there but there was nothing. So I hope I'm not making that up.

I admire the work that goes into a book like this. Sometimes I wonder if I have a work of non-fiction like this in me - I certainly have the passionate interest in the subject matter...I just don't know if I know how to go about writing the book.

But that's what I leave you with today - this was a great book...and it's books like this that inspire me to think about someday writing something that comes close to it.

New Thing #142: The Memory Palace

Memory_PalaceThis is a unique time for me: I'm all caught up on my podcasts.

This includes the newest addition to my podcast subscriptions.

It's called The Memory Palace.

It's hosted by a guy named Nate DiMeo, who according to the show's website, co-authored a book about Parks and Recreation.

He's been doing this show for a bunch of years, I guess, and recently he was picked up by the Maximum Fun network of podcasts.

And that's how I found out about it.

You remember the Maximum Fun network...I mentioned it when I told you about Bullseye back in January.

The Memory Palace is a history podcast, but it's history told in story form.

Which is a huge strength...but also a weakness of this podcast.

It's a strength because it's cool to hear some of these stories which I've never heard before. The best episodes are ones that remind me of Paul Harvey stories - there's a little twist and you expect to hear, "And now you know....the rest of the story." Man, I loved those.

But it's a weakness because some of the stories I've heard a version of on some other storytelling-type podcast. And when I've already heard the story and you can see what's coming, well, that's not The Memory Palace's fault, but it definitely takes away from that particular episode.

Here's the type of episode I loved: A story about the first elephant to touch American soil. I never would have thought about that, but obviously there had to be a first of every non-native species. That was a cool one. There was a good one about the Otis family - as in the Otis elevator family. (Otis didn't invent elevators...he invented the braking system!) And another story about Roger Babson, which doesn't seem like it would be interesting, but it was.

And, oh man - Episode 44 (distance) - that one's amazing. Start there if you're interested. I won't even give you a summary, because it's almost a near-perfect example of the form.

If you're interested in PT Barnum, he pops up every so often...and is probably rivaled by only the Civil War in the 'most mentions' category.

The podcasts come out about once a month these days, and they're pretty short. I caught up on the whole catalog that's available in about a week. (I don't think the first 10 episodes were available, so I still need to listen to those - I need to see if they're available on the website.)

But perhaps the best thing about this podcast? It's good for kids. I've already played a couple in my classroom - the elephant one, one about Henry 'Box' Brown, and I plan on playing one about 'Crazy Bet', a woman who helped spy for the Union Army in the Civil War. I'm always on the lookout for podcasts that I can bring into the classroom, but most have something that makes it tough for me to have fifth graders listen to. Most of these episodes are OK.

And now that I'm caught up on this - and the rest of my podcasts - it's time to try a new one. I'm thinking of exploring education - some podcast about education and teaching, not necessarily an educational podcast.

I'd be happy to take your suggestions.

New Thing #92: 1716 Eggs Benedict

1716_BenedictFor the past couple of years on Easter we've gone to brunch at an inn in Concord, Massachusetts that dates back to 1716. There's an all-you-can eat brunch buffet, and it hasn't exactly featured a ton of variety.

In other words, it's the usual brunch fare - omelet station, meat carving station, breakfast foods, some desserts.

This year, though, there was something different.

Among the offerings was something called '1716 Eggs Benedict.'

Instead of poached eggs on an english muffin, they were on top of a pancake...with some bacon mixed in there.

It was a new twist on a dish I love - I'll always order Eggs Benedict if it's being offered...and whether it's a different topping or something different with the sauce, different places have different minor variations.

But the constant is usually the bread - english muffin, or portuguese muffin (I think that's what it's called...and I suppose those should be proper nouns, but I'm not really sure) - but I'd never seen a pancake before.

It struck me as soon as I saw it on someone else's plate. My sister-in-law sat down with it and I asked her if they had the poached eggs at the buffet already poached - you don't usually see that. And she said, "It comes like this." She meant it came poached atop the pancake, but I thought she just meant poached.

I guess it makes sense: If they're re-creating a dish from 1716 - I suppose you'd have a pancake under the egg and not much fancier bread.

But it's 2013 now. The pancake is a novelty for my Eggs Benedict.

Given the choice, I'll take my english muffin.

English muffin. Yeah, it should be capitalized.

New Thing #84: 'The Presidents' by Jonathan Coulton

A couple of months ago there was a big flap on Twitter involving the TV show Glee and a guy named Jonathan Coulton. Coulton seemed to be a pretty big deal among some of the folks I follow on Twitter.

Apparently Glee used one of Coulton's songs (an arranged cover - is that what it's called? It was a cover, but he did it in his own style.), the way he had arranged it, but the show didn't give him any kind of credit.

Then I heard an interview with Coulton on the 'Bullseye' podcast.

He's a prolific, independent singer/songwriter with a large, large following.

So I looked into him a bit for this week's Music Monday.

One song in particular stood out to me, partly because it is closely connected to a big theme in my life right now - the presidents. (My students are researching the presidents, my daughter is very interested in them, and yesterday we saw the link to the doodle-drawings of the presidents...as well as a tangible representation of my daughter's aforementioned interest.)

The song is called 'The Presidents', and it was originally released in 2005, but it appears Coulton does updated versions through Obama in his live performances. (It also appears the song is a bear to perform live, and his live performances often involve stops and starts because it's hard to remember the order. At the end of this post is a video of one such performance with minimal errors.)

It's fun, it's funny - except for some slightly strong language it would be fun to share with my class. And my daughter.

In the interview I heard with JoCo, as he appears to be known, he was working full-time in software and doing the music as a hobby before giving up his job to pursue what he loved all the time. His bio is here - I think his big claim to fame was releasing a song a week for a year on his web site. (That seems like an activity I can get behind.)

You can preview and purchase his music here ('The Presidents' is on the 'Thing A Week Three' collection) - and I'm pretty sure I knew nothing about him before I heard about this whole Glee thing in January.

But maybe you can help me out here: I'm sure Jonathan Coulton is a New Thing to me...but if that's the case then why does he seem so familiar?

New Thing #83: Drawings Of The Presidents

My friend Dave (living in Jersey City, formerly of Michigan, Los Angeles, and Boston...I think I've mentioned him) sent me an e-mail last week. The subject line: "Do this as a new thing"

A command - not even a request.

But it's cool...I didn't take offense.

I just clicked the link and made it a New Thing.

I don't know anything about the site - 'The Rumpus'. (Maybe New Thing #83.5 will be   me further exploring 'The Rumpus'.)

But I do think this link is pretty great - where the guy completes his daughter's doodles and turns them into all of the presidents. I endorse that kind of fatherly creativity.

And it also hit close to home. I think I've mentioned before how my oldest daughter has recently been very interested in the presidents. She's good at listing many of them in order, and she loves reading about them. (Remember, too, it was due to this recent obsession that she picked James Madison University to win the NCAA Tournament.)

Around Presidents' Day, she also started to draw the presidents - kind of like baseball cards, except showing pictures of the presidents. I think she planned on making a complete set - but as it stands, she's only through three.

I think it's brilliant, and seeing this post on The Rumpus inspired me to post it here:

3_Presidents

New Thing #69: First Ladies - Influence & Image

My oldest daughter has been really interested in the presidents lately. Either she surprises us with a fact that she knows...or she asks us a question that I find myself surprised that I know the answer to.

I've kind of unexpectedly become a mini-expert on the presidents.

I'm far from a scholar...but I'm finding that I know quite a bit.

I credit 9 years of teaching fifth grade, where my students each year have written research papers on a variety of our country's presidents.

I also know a bit about their wives - and I hope to learn more, thanks to a new series on C-SPAN.

FL_WebHeader_Logo

I know, C-SPAN. It sounds boring. But it's kind of interesting.

A couple of weeks ago they premiered a show called "First Ladies: Influence & Image."

When they kicked off the series, they did two separate panel discussions over a couple of hours about the roles a First Lady plays. It was surprising because we were expecting a produced, narrated story about a First Lady. But another surprising aspect of it was that I couldn't stop watching - it was very interesting.

I figured with the actual individual profiles, which began the next week with Martha Washington, there would be video and voice-over. We had seen an article in 'Parade Magazine' a few weeks ago that previewed the series, and we just assumed it would be a regular TV show. Instead, again, it was a roundtable discussion with some pre-recorded portions.

(Truth be told, I have yet to see the Martha Washington episode: The first episode was pre-empted by the budget news in Washington, getting bumped to midnight, so my DVR missed it. So now I'm stuck in the position of waiting for C-SPAN to air a First Ladies marathon so I can catch the repeat of Martha Washington. A lower point in my life I can not recall.)

My data is based on the Abigail Adams episode. She's in the upper echelon of First Ladies, so I assume all the shows will follow the format of her show.

C-SPAN tries to make the show interactive. It's live, apparently, which I didn't realize, and they invite you to tweet them or message them on Facebook, or call in with questions. I might take advantage of that and see if I can get on the air somehow. (Guess what kind of people call into C-SPAN on a Monday night? Yup...it was about 50-50 in the Abigail Adams episode that the caller was going to be a nut. That added an interesting tension to the proceedings. Although I will say, the woman who hosted the show handled the, um, unprofessional calls smoothly.)

Two episodes are done - they're going to go in order over two seasons until all the First Ladies are covered.

I find the discussions about the First Ladies very interesting - I don't know if it would be everyone's cup of tea. But if you're going to start watching, I'd say now would be a good time. It looks like they're giving short shrift to Martha Jefferson, who I don't think lived to be a First Lady, and jumping to Dolley Madison (who I think played hostess during Jefferson's presidency as well as Madison's). I'd recommend starting with her - she was an interesting woman.

New Thing #53: Framingham Timeline Exhibit

Framingham_HistoryI'm good with American history, and I really like Boston history. My town, Framingham, dates back to 1700, so I know it has a lot of history, but I don't know as much about it.

For a long time I've thought about exploring that history, starting with some of the exhibits hosted by the Framingham History Center.

That was one of the big goals of '365 New Things In 2013' - to take some of those things I've been meaning to do and just do them.

So on Thursday, I did.

The building above is an old schoolhouse that has been converted into a research center/exhibit hall. Its hours are very spotty - you can set up individual appointments, but it is open for a few hours Wednesdays through Saturdays.

One time I walked up to it, it was all locked up, so I went home to look up more information. It's been a couple of years, and I hadn't been back.

Thursday my oldest daughter and I walked up to it....and it was locked. This time (New Things!) I rang the bell. It took a couple of minutes, and we were on our way back to the car, before the door opened.

The woman who opened the door looked surprised to see anyone. She went to check whether they were available for tours. It turned out the scheduled tour guide was not there. Would we want her to give a tour? My instinct was to say we'd come back another time. But I went against my instinct (New Things!) and took her up on her offer.

I'm glad I finally got the chance to check it out. I didn't learn anything earth-shatteringly new, but I did get an idea of how Framingham fits into the larger history of Massachusetts. (It was an overnight stop for cannons being transported between Fort Ticonderoga and Cambridge in 1776!)

Best fact I learned: Thomas Danforth, Framingham's founder, came from Framlingham, England. The 'l' was dropped, and there you have it - Framingham.

The 'Framingham Timeline' is the permanent exhibit at this location - it takes you from the earliest days of the town (actually, pre-1700 with some information about Native Americans in the area) through the 19th century (Civil War artifacts and the rise of the railroad in Framingham), and 20th century (one of Christa McAuliffe's NASA uniforms - she was raised in Framingham - the famous Framingham Heart Study, businesses like Bose and Staples).

The original public library in town is another site that hosts exhibits. Right now the big attraction is a display about the original Shopper's World - an outdoor shopping area, dating back to when those were not exactly common. I'll be checking that out too sometime before that exhibit closes out in September...maybe as soon as this week.

New Thing #30: Lincoln

Lincoln_StubI'm hoping that a good chunk of my "New Things" this year are movies. I just don't watch a lot of movies.

My thinking is that if I'm going to spend 2-3 hours on something, I'd rather give that time to sports rather than movies. (It's not that I don't enjoy the movies - I like movies a lot. It's more about just not having the time.)

But this year is about trying new things, and seeing movies is part of that.

And last Saturday, for the first time in 2013, I went to the movies to see 'Lincoln'.

I love history, and to be honest, I felt this was a movie I had to see more than I wanted to see.

But man, am I sure glad I did.

'Lincoln' was excellent.

Best Movie of the year? I don't know - I'm hoping to see a few more nominees so I can make an informed judgment. But it certainly deserves its place in the discussion, and Daniel Day-Lewis earned all the accolades being thrown his way. Every single thing about the movie was outstanding.

I think it's especially meaningful since it's out now, when we have a black president, and you think of how far our country has come. (And reflect on how scary it is to think about what our country was like not all that long ago.) You have to see 'Lincoln'. It's that good.

When I see a good movie like 'Lincoln'  it inspires me. Sometimes it's to try to write my own movie. In this case there was a little bit of a desire to explore politics some more. But I also left 'Lincoln' thinking I need to learn more about him and the Civil War.

My favorite part of history is the American Revolution. Maybe not even the war itself, but the lead-up to the war. I know there's tons to learn about with the Civil War, but for some reason it never caught my interest as much. I've been to Gettysburg - I enjoy seeing sites like that - but maybe all of the info just seems overwhelming to me.

Anyway, that's how good 'Lincoln' was. For years I didn't think I cared to learn any more than what I already knew about the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln. Now I just want to learn it all.

Maybe Steven Spielberg can put together another movie for me.